(keitai-l) Re: Long shot, but is short messaging a thousand years old?

From: Nick May <nick_at_kyushu.com>
Date: 08/10/03
Message-Id: <F1ACB5EE-CB45-11D7-8DED-00039377A93A@kyushu.com> 
On Sunday, August 10, 2003, at 08:20 PM, keitai-l@appelsiini.net wrote:

> 1) short.
> 2) carefully crafted.
> 3) a immediate reply is necessary (a second carefully crafted short
> message).

well, 1 fits the criteria for modern short messaging, but 2 and 3 
certainly don't...

Nick
Received on Sun Aug 10 18:24:56 2003