(keitai-l) Re: Long shot, but is short messaging a thousand years old?

From: Curt Sampson <cjs_at_cynic.net>
Date: 08/11/03
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.4.51.0308111426200.7740@angelic-vtfw.cvpn.cynic.net>
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, Nick May wrote:

> On Sunday, August 10, 2003, at 08:20 PM, keitai-l@appelsiini.net wrote:
>
> > 1) short.
> > 2) carefully crafted.
> > 3) a immediate reply is necessary (a second carefully crafted short
> > message).
>
> well, 1 fits the criteria for modern short messaging, but 2 and 3
> certainly don't...

I dunno. I've seen a lot of careful crafting of e-moji and suchlike....

cjs
-- 
Curt Sampson  <cjs_at_cynic.net>   +81 90 7737 2974   http://www.NetBSD.org
    Don't you know, in this new Dark Age, we're all light.  --XTC
Received on Mon Aug 11 08:32:58 2003