hello,
benedict hit the nail on the head. 3g is primarliy about extra bandwidth.
how many people here have made a voice call on foma. I have an the quality
is excellent - much better than a landline.
the quality of calls also extends to international. making a call to the uk
i am almost always told by the receiver that the call quailty is as if i am
in the next room.
video telephony is an extra function. i agree that making a video is
difficult. well talking is as unless you have a handsfree- its very
difficult to hear the caller. for me, that sound issue is the biggest
problem. in terms of making a vid call, its easy - press the video call
button. in relation to whether vid calls are any good i would say yes they
are. i called my friend in the uk with a 3 phone and the pic quality was
amazing. the sensation i was left with after the call was that i had entered
the next phase of communication - my friend felt so also. it was an
experience i will never forget. suck it and see as they(?) say...
darren
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ken Chang" <carigate@yahoo.com>
To: <keitai-l@appelsiini.net>
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 8:53 AM
Subject: (keitai-l) Re: Mobile Video Telephony
> (1)
> I think video call may have a not so dark future in the US because
> voice call MoU there is 2-3 times than in Japan.
>
> the fight between voice and data services is all about separating
> talking and listening between human beings. a development similar
> to the invention of money. (broadcasting is in the middle.)
[ excessive quoting removed by moderator ]
Received on Tue Oct 26 14:48:59 2004