(keitai-l) Re: m-mode

From: Ken Chang <kench_at_hotmail.com>
Date: 06/11/02
Message-ID: <F153OvWPAUTpFJ1u8ky00013e7e@hotmail.com>
does anyone know what happens to TCP?

C-HTML doesn't make difference.  J-Phone supports C-HTML,
MML, and WML.  does any user can tell the difference?

DoCoM has a compact-TCP, known as TLP, between the handset
and the M-PGW gateway.  everyone else try to avoid using
TCP because it has a lot of problems over thin and lossy
links.  DoCoMo didn't believe it when they designed i-mode.
it makes the bandwidth challenged network more congested.

... but TCP support is one of the reasons behind the i-mode
success that you can use a lot of Internet protocols with
little modification.


From: "Brendan P. Murphy" <brendanm@cs.bu.edu>
Reply-To: keitai-l@appelsiini.net
To: <keitai-l@appelsiini.net>
Subject: (keitai-l) Re: m-mode
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 00:32:01 -0400

----- Original Message -----
From: "Kyle Barrow" <kyle@x-9.com>
To: "KEITAI-L Mailing List" <keitai-l@appelsiini.net>
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 9:27 PM
Subject: (keitai-l) Re: m-mode

>On 2002-06-11 01:44, "Monika Lischke" <monika@lischke.net> wrote:
>
>>Does anyone know, why i-mode is called m-mode in the states?
>>How big are the differences between the Japanese and American i-mode?
>>Thank you in advance, Monika
>
>m-mode is based on wap not i-mode html.

temporarily, cHTML will be supported this summer.
brendan

--

X-9 design lab  :  http://www.x-9.com



_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com
Received on Tue Jun 11 11:00:11 2002