On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 11:41:42PM +0900, Thomas O'Dowd wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 03:25:01PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 04:21:30AM -0700, DC wrote:
<snip>
> > > one way to resolve this would be to implement a new tag for video calls...
> >
> > That's a stupid way to do things. It would be better to add a parameter to
> > URLs (e.g. tel:...;vnd.nttdcomo.video=1). Unfortunately this might confuse
> > old phones that have a very limited knowledge of the 'tel' URL scheme, so
> > maybe it would be necessary.
>
> DoCoMo already has added new parameters, but not for video. They basically
> added the telbook parameter which makes it handy for someone to add you
> to their telephone book without having to type in your name etc.
Those are extra attributes for the A tag. I was thinking of adding a
parameter to URLs.
> It's still limited but there...
Seems to me that the handset should use the link's content as a suggested
name.
> http://www.nttdocomo.com/i/tag/tel.html
>
> The notes on this page and my testing confirm that...
> * Terminals that do not support this function will only recognize the HREF
> attribute and will function with the PHONE TO and MAIL TO functions.
Yuck, what a hack. Why don't they just support vcards instead of trying to
kluge all this into HTML?
[ Need archives? How to unsubscribe? http://www.appelsiini.net/keitai-l/ ]
Received on Mon Oct 8 17:54:03 2001