On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 04:21:30AM -0700, DC wrote:
> I don't think the 'tel' tag is designed for video calls, just voice.
There is no 'tel' tag, but there is a 'tel' scheme. A video call is still a
voice call too - it's not a completely different medium.
> the phone has two buttons for different call initiation procedures and isn't
> able to detect what its calling and switch automatically (eg from voice to
> 64k circuit switched video mode).
So if you try to make a video call, does the call simply fail if the called
number doesn't support video calls? If so, that's a serious UI flaw, in my
opinion.
> one way to resolve this would be to implement a new tag for video calls...
That's a stupid way to do things. It would be better to add a parameter to
URLs (e.g. tel:...;vnd.nttdcomo.video=1). Unfortunately this might confuse
old phones that have a very limited knowledge of the 'tel' URL scheme, so
maybe it would be necessary.
--
Ben Hutchings | personal web site: http://womble.decadentplace.org.uk/
If more than one person is responsible for a bug, no one is at fault.
[ Need archives? How to unsubscribe? http://www.appelsiini.net/keitai-l/ ]
Received on Mon Oct 8 17:13:42 2001