On 23 Dec 2003, at 16:12, Gerhard Fasol wrote:
> It's not the carriers who make that choice!!! it's the consumers!
> they decide what they pay for!
Of course they do; but the choices they can make are decided by the
operators, who decide which handsets to subsidise, aren't they?
> The customers decide: no carrier, no committee, no government.
> If 2 million customers put good money on the table to get a
> 2 million pixel phone, the carriers oblige, as simple as that.
Is the Japanese consumer more concerned about specific features (i.e.
are they demanding 2 megapixel phones) than European consumers then?
I think I've gotten confused; in a previous email you said that the
reason Japanese handsets have better quality cameras now is that higher
ARPU lets operators subsidise more expensive devices.
> Regarding the faster gaming, better video support etc.
> They do that as well!
> It's not cameras or games and video!
> It's cameras AND games and video!
I'm sure you can understand the point I was making: given that Japanese
telcos can subsidise better handsets than their European counterparts,
why have they chosen camera quality as a specific feature to subsidise
when there are others they could put money into? I presume that the
extra money available to them thanks to their higher ARPU is finite and
won't let them subsidise every new feature that they want...
>> Particularly when these better
>> quality cameraphones, some of which can't even transmit photos over
>> mobile networks, don't generate any revenue for the network
>> themselves?
> That's a narrow minded view point. The business models are more
> complex than that.
Can you explain some more? I always imagined that the networks want to
make money, and do so by providing paid-for services to their
customers.... I apologise if that's narrow-minded.
---
Future Platforms Ltd
www.futureplatforms.com
e: tom@futureplatforms.com
t: +44 (0) 870 0055924
m: +44 (0) 7971 781422
Received on Wed Dec 24 11:48:24 2003