Substantiate that biometrics do/can not provide security. Remember that
biometrics means more than fingerprints.
kgm
-----Original Message-----
From: keitai-l-bounce@appelsiini.net
[mailto:keitai-l-bounce@appelsiini.net] On Behalf Of Dirk R=F6sler
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 6:38 PM
To: keitai-l@appelsiini.net
Subject: (keitai-l) Re: Jelly finger fools biometric sensor
http://www.infosecuritymag.com/2002/nov/retrospective.shtml (scroll=20
down to Jim Wayman).
July '98 WAYMAN said: On biometrics..."I think the industry has set up=20
[a] negative perception, because it has claimed biometrics are=20
foolproof in terms of identification for security purposes. That's the=20
wrong approach. Number one, it's not foolproof. And number two, it=20
really isn't for security--it's for convenience."
Dirk
This mail was sent to address ken@mages.tv
Need archives? How to unsubscribe? http://www.appelsiini.net/keitai-l/=20
Received on Fri Dec 6 02:57:28 2002