On Sat, 20 Jul 2002, Ken Chang wrote:
<snip>
> MIME/SMTP -> HTML/HTTP message retrieval is the MMS standard which
> allows for better delivery and playback of multimedia messages on
> handsets than POP3/IMAP.
<snip>
IMAP is vastly more powerful than POP3, and shouldn't be grouped together
with it.
Why do you think that HTTP is better for retrieving multimedia messages?
Do you know that IMAP allows retrieval of individual parts of a multi-part
message? (Some clients don't do that, but that's not the fault of the
protocol.)
Received on Thu Jul 25 16:02:24 2002