WAP 2.0, in the proper implementation is pretty good, actually, as evidenced
by KDDI.
On 6/27/02 12:06 PM, "Kolsky Amir" <Amir.Kolsky@comverse.com> wrote:
> WAP is definitely NOT the best technology guys... There are so many things
> wrong with it, it boggles the mind...
>
> A.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mika Tuupola [mailto:tuupola@appelsiini.net]
> Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 1:33 PM
> To: keitai-l@appelsiini.net
> Subject: (keitai-l) Re: GSM, PDC and proprietary systems
>
>
> On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Ken Chang wrote:
>
>> btw, I'm no fan of dirty politics within WAP, but it's the best
>> technology. have a look at au/KDDI and SKT services.
>
> One good thing to remember when discussing whether some
> technology / protocol is better than someone else is that
> the most widely used protocols aren't usually the technogolically
> most advanced ones. Think about SMTP or HTTP. They aren't
> technologigally too advanced. They have quite a lot overhead.
> But the main thing about them is that theyre _easy to implement_.
>
Received on Fri Jun 28 03:36:47 2002