Gerhard Fasol wrote:
> Marc Printz wrote:
> > Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > WAP is not meant to be a brand!
> > > </snippet>
> >
> > Of course, and obviously, WAP *is* meant to be a brand ...
> > It is just a brand for something
> > different than i-mode.
>
> 1. The WAP-forum has very detailed regulations how its trademarks
> (including "W@P" etc) may and may not be used.
> The information is here:
> http://www.wapforum.com/wap_logos/trademarkusage.htm
> Seems to have aspects of a brand...
In my mind, certification is not quite the same thing as branding.
This seems like the CDDA logo on CD players - is that a brand too?
[ Need archives? How to unsubscribe? http://www.appelsiini.net/keitai-l/ ]
Received on Mon Aug 6 12:32:57 2001