(keitai-l) Re: Who to believe

From: Kyle Barrow <kyle_at_X-9.com>
Date: 10/27/00
Message-ID: <NDBBIBLMOEECJPBNJNKCGEAJCEAA.kyle@X-9.com>
DoCoMo has the N821i and R209i specs at
http://www.nttdocomo.co.jp/mc-user/i/tag/s5.html.

http://homepage1.nifty.com/scs/keitai/picsize.html NM502i specs are way
out - our tests resulted with a max 111x77 pixel size.

Kyle

-----Original Message-----
From: keitai-l-bounce@appelsiini.net
[mailto:keitai-l-bounce@appelsiini.net]On Behalf Of Mika Tuupola
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2000 4:01 PM
To: KEITAI-L
Subject: (keitai-l) Re: Who to believe


On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, Kyle Barrow wrote:

> While I can accept a 1 pixel deviation in height, it seems DoCoMo's specs
> are wrong for the NM502i at least. What about other phones? The
BrowserHawk
> i-mode data I supply relies on the browser screen size specs but should I
be
> using stand-by screen size instead?

	Found a nice list about different screensizes af different
	imagesizes (browsing, incoming call etc):

		http://homepage1.nifty.com/scs/keitai/picsize.html

	Most of these sizes also differ from what is given at the
	NTT DoCoMo site. Good thing is that the site has info on
	N821i and R209i which I havent seen yet elsewhere. Not sure
	though which numbers I should believe. In the url above
	the author says "Because it is what originally examined, it
	might be wrong." (elingo translation)


--
Mika Tuupola                      http://www.appelsiini.net/~tuupola/


[ Did you check the archives?   http://www.appelsiini.net/keitai-l/ ]



[ Did you check the archives?   http://www.appelsiini.net/keitai-l/ ]
Received on Fri Oct 27 10:09:28 2000