>cHTML over WAP
>
>+
>It will be easier to convert existing sites from HTML to cHTML
>Extensive existing services
>Commercially developed for 2 years
>Graphically more pleasing
>
>-
>Only one company is backing cHTML (NTT DoCoMo) - so it is prorietary
>Confined to Japanese market
>Over 500 companies are backing WAP
The quoted lines above are from posting from a wap mailinglist.
One thing which caught my eye is the claim that cHTML was
proprietary.
Ok my native language is not english but I understand the
word proprietary bit different than "only one company
backing something". I understand that if cHTML was proprietary
by NTT DoCoMo no one else was alloved to use cHTML (well
atleast without licencec fees). cHTML is free for everyone to
use.
proprietary - proprietary substances are ones sold under
a trade name; formal word.
--
Mika Tuupola http://www.appelsiini.net/~tuupola/
Received on Sat Jul 8 15:12:52 2000